Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

130 inappropriate.' It also concluded that the legislation would frustrate the work for hire doctrine applicable to motion pictures under U.S. copyright law and film industry contractual practice. VIII. CONCLUSION Mr. Chainnan, VSDA and the Committee for America's Copyright Community oppose H.R. 1248. We submit that the current system works. It works because over the last two hundred years, it has encouraged the creation and dissemination of works which has made our copyright industry a national and world leader. It is a system that provides both flexibility and predictability, allowing parties to create contracts that adapt to meet new technologies. The industry-wide voluntary labeling program and the collective bargaining agreements are perfect examples. The marketplace, not Congress, should respond to the consumers. Congress should continue to let this marketplace operate under its thriving system. H.R. 1248 is not only a threat to our country's film industry, it is a threat to our entire copyright system. In order to protect consumers. Congress should continue to reject efforts to recognize moral rights across a broad range of copyrighted works. Starting down the road of moral rights will only bring the dissemination of copyrighted works to a grinding halt. ' "Trademark Act of 1946 and Technologies for Alteration of Motion Pictures," 1989 Patent and Trademark OflSce Report to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the House of Judiciary Committee. 15