Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

183 views were presented primarily by users of public domain motion picnires and law professors. " All of these comments are considered in the discussion below of arguments for and against extension of Copyright term. Staff shortages kept the Office from completing this smdy, but we kept all of the materials and have made them available to the public on request. Moreover, we will be glad to provide a copy of the transcript of the hearing and comments should the subcomminee want them for the record. Having reviewed both sides of the argument presented to the Copyright Office in 1993 and those made before this subcomminee at the June 1 hearing on H.R. 989 in California, one can only conclude that the issue of term extension is more complicated than the sometimes oversimplified or overblown argtiments made on both sides would lead one to believe. Instead of an exhaustive retelling of those arguments, the Office has prepared a chan identifying most, if not all, of them. ^ We choose here to review the major arguments on term extension in light of the 1976 considerations that are still relevant and to evaluate other considerations. " One individual educator opposed term extension (Comment 5 1 ). Another commentator opposed extension because he felt it would cause great harm to the Gutenberg Project, which makes public domain works available internationally via electronic media. (Comment 83). A coalition group of law professors also opposed extension. (Commem 19). Sgs jIjs Comment 136, Society for Cinema Studies . Another individual commentator deplored not being able to put deteriorating materials on the Internet to promote public access. (Commeu 26). Some individual authors, producers, scriptwriters and filmmakers also opposed extension. ยง^ e.g., Comments 7S, 77, 86, 128, 130 and 160. [All of the other commentaton who opposed extension were either those who want to use public domain motion pictures or warn to have access to these films]. ** This chart is attached to die statement as an Appendix. dirrVdunooiLloc July 11, 199$ 22