Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

189 term should take care of his daughters. " On the other hand, the Berne Convention seems to have accepted the premise that a work should extend to the author and two generations, thus, to the grandchildren. The EU Directive on Term also mentions the author and two generations of heirs. In 1978 the United States adopted a term of the life of the author plus 50 years. This eliminated the possibility that an author might outlive his work. However, for the pre1978 copyrights, it added an extra 19 years; thus, making 75 years the longest possible term. Also, for these works, to obtain the full term, a renewal claim had to be made in the 28th year of the first term. In looking at the criteria used in the past, since some authors of pre1978 copyrights or their widows or widowers are outliving the cunent term, the 20 year extension would seem justified. With respect to works created on or after January 1, 1978, a longer term may be necessary to safieguard even one succeeding generatioa However, life plus 70 is an extremely long period of time, as is a term of 95 years from publication or 120 years from creatioa To reflect the balance intended in the Constimtion, Congress must make sure that works that are not being made available to the American public are still accessible. This is especially critical to smdents, scholars and researchers. Thus, if the term is lengthened, the concerns expressed from library associations in their July 11, 1995 letter to Mr. Moorhead must be addressed. '° One way to address some of these concerns is to create a limited exemption during the extra 20 years for nonprofit educational instimtions and libraries who provide materials that are directly related to nonprofit instructional activities. "' S« note supra al Proposal to Amend and Consolidate the Acts Respecting Copyright. 1906: Hearings on S. 6330 and H.R. 19853 Before the Joint Committees on Patents, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 16 (1906) (statement of Samual L. Clemens, author). " See Letter from Robert Oakley, Washington Affairs Representative, American Association of Law Libraries; Carol Henderson, Executive Director, Washington Office, American Library Associations; David Bender, Executive Director, Special Library Association; and Carla Funil, Executive Director, Medical Library Association; to the Honorable Carlos Moorhead, Chaiman, Intellecnial Property Subcommine. House Judiciary Comminee (July 1 1 , 1995). dirrVduradoiLloc July 11. 1995 28