Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

331 16 paid for a 56 year term. The Authors Guild of America declared, referring to the then existing 28-year renewal term and the proposed extension of that term by 19 years: [Book publishers] sit down and carefully estimate what their 50 percent share of those 28 years of earnings will be, and they pay a modest portion of it as an advance. I don't see how they'd be hurt one iota if they don't get the next 19 years ... . [T]hey haven't paid for it or bargained for it. They've simply computed the value of a 2 8 -year annuity, and they've had a full and fair opportunity to recover that and a profit as well.^' Similarly, the American Guild of Authors and Composers stated that [Music publishers] aren't bargaining for any more than 28 years. They're not giving an advance of $15,000 saying, "Well, $13,000 for 28 years and $2,000 if we get a few more years if [Congress] extend[s] the law." They are bargaining for 28 years, and they have thrown in the other wording on the theory that "if we can get it good; if we can't well then we have lost just a few words. We haven't lost a single dollar. "^^ This reference to "other wording" was to a previous statement by an attorney whose firm had been representing music publishers since 1919, and had inserted the following language in all contracts with songwriters: If the copyright law of the United States now in force shall be changed or amended so as to provide for an extended or longer term of copyright, then the writer hereby sells, assigns, transfers, and sets over unto the publisher, its successors and assigns or designees, all his right, title, and interest in. and to said musical compositions covered by this agreement, for such extended or longer term of copyright.^ This practice of inserting this clause in contracts was common. ^^ These are, though, the contracts that H.R. 989 will. Id. at 43. But see criticism of this characterization of "advances," id, at 45, and its defense, id. ^° Idj. at 42. ^^ Id. at 39. ^^ See id. at 41, 45.