Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

335 20 to ensure that the termination right was inalienable and unwaivable, no agreement to transfer rights after termination would be valid unless entered into after termination had occurred, with the exception that a future agreement between the author and the original transferee would be valid if entered into after the notice of termination has been filed; (8) the proportionate shares between the widow and children were specified. In preparation for the first congressional hearings on the revision effort, Register of Copyrights Abraham Kaminstein issued a supplementary report. '° The report traces the origins of the termination of transfer provisions to the failure of the 1909 Act to adequately give authors a second bite at the apple. Although noting the objections of publishers and the motion picture industry, who asserted that authors are not generally in a poor bargaining position, the Register concluded that the Copyright Office "remained committed to the general principle of reversion as one of the most important elements of the copyright law revision program."'^ At hearings before the House in 1965, the parties noted their individual wishes that the bill had been more favorable to them, but stuck by their compromise on termination, and strongly supported the life plus 50 term.'-' How the Term of Protection Provisions in the 1976 Act Work The 1976 Act's treatment of duration may be divided into three parts: (1) works created on or after January 1, 1978; (2) works unpublished and unregistered on January 1, 1978. Works Created On or After January 1, 1978: Section 302 '° Copyright Law Revision Part 6; Supplementary Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law: 1965 Revision Bill. 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (House Comm. Print 1965) . ''^ Id. at 71-72. '2 Id. at 72. '^ See Copyright Law Revision: Hearings on H.R. 4347 Before Subcomm. No. 3 of the House Judiciary Comm. . 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 82-84, 92-94, 95-96, 1761-1765 (Authors League) ; 129, 142, 147-148 (book publishers); 162-164 (magazine publishers); 228-234, 239, 242-245 (American Guild of Authors & Composers); 251, 255, 257 (magazine photographers); 996-997. 1010, 1035-1037, 1048-1049 (motion picture companies); 1866-1870 (Copyright Office) (1965) .