Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

361 latest round of multilateral trade negotiations.' It then examines the pending proposal to emulate the Council of the European Communities' Directive on harmonizing the term of copyright and certain related rights.' This analysis focuses on the drive for uniformity of copyright lavs and on efforts to improve the condition of authors and artists in general. The statement find that proposals to extend the term of protection under U.S. law cannot be justified in terms of a drive for uniformity as such, nor do they appear socially desirable in so far as the protection of works made for hire and corporate authors in general are concerned. However, a better case can be made for extending the proprietary rights of traditional artists and authors on the grounds of cultural policy, provided that certain conditions and safeguards are observed. Among the most * See Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, done at Marrakesh, Morocco, April 15, 1994 [hereinafter Final Act], reprinted in The Results of the Urogoay Roond of Multilateral Trade Negotiations — The Legal Texts 2-3 (GATT Secretariat ed., 1994) [hereinafter Results of THE Uruguay Round]; Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization [hereinafter WTO Agreement], Armex IC: Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994 [hereinafter TRIPS Agreement], reprinted in Results of the Uruguay Round, supra . at 6-19, 365-403. For congressional approval, see Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Pub. L. No. 103-465 [H.R. 5110], Dec. 8, 1994 [hereinafter URAA] , SS 101103 (authorizing President to accept Uruguay Round Agreements and Implement WTO Agreement, supra . art. VIII; but denying treaty status and domestic legal effect to Uruguay Round Agreements as such, and excluding private actions under those Agreements) . • S&S. Council Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993, harmonizing the terms of protection of copyright emd certain related rights, [1993] O.J.L. 290/9, reprinted in Sweet & Maxwell's E.C. Intellectual Property Materials 29-35 (A. Boody & A. Horton eds., 1994) [hereinafter E.C. Directive].