Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

384 are directly or indirectly tied to the issue of duration.^ The European Connission has doggedly pursued this path with respect to the criterion of originality used to determine eligibility in the domestic copyright laws of the Community, for exeunple.^ To do otherwise would saddle the Community with hidden barriers to trade and disregard the edicts of the Europeam Court of Justice, as most recently manifested in the Phil Collins Decision.^ Absent such levelling to lessen the divergent national traditions of the participating states, however, a superficial alignment with respect to selected terms of duration alone produces illogical and contradictory results. By prolonging the basic term of protection afforded works made for hire under U.S. law from seventy-five to ninety-five years, H.R. 989 would only compound pre-existing differences and destabilize the degree of harmonization already underway in the context of U.S. E.U. copyright relations.''* Moreover, developing countries already struggling to defray the costs of imported cultural and technological goods will hardly welcome lengthened terms of copyright protection, any more than the United States did at earlier stages of its own economic development. On the contrary, these countries would normally ^ See, e.g.. Cohen Jehoram, supra note 39, at 827-31. ■" See, e.g.. IjL., at 828-30. " See id. . at 825-27; supra note 58 and accompanying text. ^ See supra text accompanying notes 26-44.