Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Title:
Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995
Date:
1996
Publisher:
Washington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office
Volume:
Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995
Leaf #:
000398
Language:
English
Subjects:
Copyright -- United States, Copyright -- Motion pictures United States","Motion pictures -- Labeling United States","Motion pictures -- Conservation and restoration United States
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Boston Public Library
Sponsor:
Kahle/Austin Foundation and Omidyar Network
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
July 19, 2022
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

390 create. Indeed, even the possibility such laws afford authors to provide for their heirs and dependents can, in part, be rationalized as an incentive to create.'' Nor does it mean that copyright laws disregard, or should disregard, the concerns of econoaic efficiency. Rather, "any efficiencies that copyright law produces in the market for literary and artistic works are an integral part of the larger cultural policy this body of law seeks to implement. By the same token, the most fundamental of all the negative economic premises underlying the mature copyright paradigm is that the peculiar mix of cultural and economic policies it implements on the market for artistic works should not disrupt competition in the general products market as regulated by the mature patent paradigm.'''^ In other words, the social costs attributable to the relevant cultural policies remain tolerable only so long as the peculiar and specialized market for literary and artistic productions remains insulated from the general products market, where industrial property laws traditionally tip the balance toward free competition rather than legal incentives to create.** " See e.g. . Ricketson, supra note 70, at 761. " Reichman, Collapse of the Patent-Copvriaht Dichotomy. fillBEA note 4, at 495. •* Sgg, e.g., 17 U.S.C. $102 (b); Baker v. Selden. 101 U.S. 99 (1879); Benito Boats. Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats. Inc.. 489 U.S. 141, 151, 156-60 (1989); Feist Publications. Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co.. m s. Ct. 1282 (1991). For the breakdown of the historical line of demarcation sepeurating artistic from industrial property law, figg Collapse of the Patent-Copvriaht Dichotomy. £yB£A note 4, at 496-512; Legal Hybrids. aslBTA note