Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

393 This said, the existing term of protection already afforded publishers of works made for hire under domestic law already appears overly long and empirically unjustified when viewed either as the product of a pure incentive rationale or, more generously, through the lens of cultural policy.""* To be sure, •one subject matter categories will be less indulged than others. For example, producers of classical music and other serious or high-brow works may require a longer period of time in which to recuperate their losses from unsuccessful ventures and to post a profit from those that do succeed."" As regards the great bulk of copyrightable productions, now including computer programs and other electronic information tools, however, the existing term of protection afforded publishers of works made for hire appears too long as matters stand. "° The evidence further suggests that still longer periods of protection would not elicit significantly greater investment in the copyright industries than already occurs, emd would instead 512-20 ("The Competitive Ethos under Attack") ; Competition Law. Intellectual Property and Trade, supra note 2, at 81-98 ("Interaction Between Intellectual Property emd Trade Regulation in Innovation-Based Market Economies") . "" See, e.g.. Ricketson, supra note 70, at 763-66 (finding it "hard to believe that publishers and other initial exploiters of works base their present investment decisions on prospects of exploitation that may only arise in the distemt future"); Reese, supra note 88, at 719-27. 101 See, e.g.. Purl, supra note 70, at 15. "° See, e.g.. id., at 17-20 (citing authorities) ; see also Ricketson, supra note 70, at 763-69.