Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

531 Comments Regarding HR 989 Copyright Term Extension Statement of Daniel Abraham Graphic Artists Guild National Vice-President for Legislation before the Subcommittee on courts and Intellectual Property House Judiciary Committee II WEST 20 ST EIGHTH FLOOR NEW YORK. NY. I 0 0 I I ' 3 7 0 4 "\ (JI2) 4t3-7730 ^ (212) 4«3-8779 The Graphic Artists Guild is pleased to add its voice in favor of extending the copyright term twenty years, to seventy years beyond the life of the creator. The Guild is a national artists' advocacy organization, with a membership composed primarily of individual authors who create copyrighted material for publication, broadcast and manufacture. The life plus seventy copyright term is already in place in the European community. But as overseas protection is extended to American copyright holders only for the duration of our domestic copyright term, a twenty-year extension of the domestic term is necessary to assure the fullest worldwide return on American creativity. The proposed legislation raises these questions: 1) Who should receive windfall profits from the extension of subsisting copyrights? 2) Should the term be extended on works made for hire? 1) Windfall Profits in Subsisting Copyrights. As drafted, HR 989 will add twenty years to subsisting copyrights, automatically extending current contractual arrangements. This creates a windfall for licensees and commercial rightsholders at the expense of the creative community. Rather than extending the status quo for another generation, extension legislation should automatically terminate extant contracts at the end of a work's original copyright term, with all rights reverting to the heirs of the original creator. The heirs will then have the opportunity to sell or license rights based upon existing market value, and not be forced to acquiesce in the extension of existing commercial arrangements by Congressional fiat. At the heart of American copyright law is a contractual relationship; creators license their work to publishers.