The theatre of science; a volume of progress and achievement in the motion picture industry (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

of Science is collodion (nitrocellulose dissolved in ether and alcohol) was an utter failure. In 1887 there appeared on the scene a stalwart, white-haired, erect, unassuming American clergyman, by name Hannibal Goodwin, of the House of Prayer, Newark, N. J., claiming that he had discovered the much-prized secret. He proved it conclusively to Mr. ■Washington Irving Adams, of the Scovill & Adams Company, pioneer manufacturers of photo supplies, and to Dr. Charles Ehrmann, head chemist of the company. Dr. Goodwin's film was not celluloid, neither was it photographic collodion skin; yet it was both, plus something that no one else had ever been able to discover. This fine distinction did not help Dr. Goodwin in the Patent Office, and he did not improve his chances very much either by submitting samples of his product to different photographic manufacturers prior to his claims being allowed by the Patent Office. The Goodwin application encountered untold vicissitudes in the Patent Office, not the least of which was an interference proceedings with Reichenbach, the chemist for the Eastman Kodak Company. The Reichenbach-Eastman application did not reach the Patent Office until long after Goodwin filed his claim. Nevertheless, he was deprived of his patent for eleven x-ears; indeed, to get his patent issued at all, he was forced to appeal to the Examiners-in-Chief, who unanimously decided in favor of the Goodwin application. The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Judges Lacombe, Coxe and Ward sitting, in its opinion affirming the decree of Judge Hazel for the District Court of the United States, made this sad commentary : "Truly an extraordinary and deplorable condition of affairs! But who was to blame for it — Goodwin, or