The theatre of science; a volume of progress and achievement in the motion picture industry (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

222 CSe ceeatre when they are enabled to observe the comparative response of this public as betwreen the two modes of entertainment. Whether or not this vievirpoint will impress these gentlemen with the necessity for price bargains to tempt the new public to patronize their stage offerings, one may not doubt that the season of 1914-15 will witness a healthier condition in the amusement field generally than has existed for many years. With the Messrs. Shubert establishing a mighty film company with extensive affiliations and with several of the largest playhouses of vast seating capacity as the Manhattan Opera House, the Strand and the New York theatres and possibly Oscar Hammerstein's new opera house, permanently relegated to feature films, and with the Shuberts presenting photoplays in many of their theatres, the tendency is to greatly reduce the number of two-dollar-a-seat playhouses in all the large cities, and as these latter will more than ever before be confined to bijou auditoriums, with seating capacity from 200 to 1,200, the spectacle of crowded houses so rarely on view of late, should once more stim.ulate the producers, of whom there are fewer at this writing than at any period since those days when the field of the theatre was regarded as too precarious to induce investments. But while the trend toward "little" theatres will help to solve managerial problems in the high-priced field, the wonder is that some genius with a grasp on proportions does not tempt fate with an effort to compete with the vogue of the photoplay in the larger auditoriums. Who shall say that if photoplays can prosper in the most expensively conducted playhouses of large size at prices one-half as high as those prevailing in the best legitimate houses, that performances