The theatre of science; a volume of progress and achievement in the motion picture industry (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

of^cience 271 CHAPTER XIII Despite the apparently official announcement that the new Candler Theatre, dedicated May 7, 1914, is to be regularly operated as a legitimate playhouse, it is fair to state here that the enterprise is the natural aftermath of the remarkable success attending the Cines Kleine production of the photoplay, "Quo Vadis?" which exerted a greater influence in creating the present-day plethora of stage plays on the screen than any individual achievement of the camera man to this day. Yet "Quo Vadis?" singularly is the one erstwhile stage success to completely eclipse as a photoplay its theatrical vogue. Although "Quo Vadis?" brought George Kleine into the limelight with an impetus unprecedented in amusement history, his influence in the film industry had been recognized long before the era of photoplays was inaugurated, and he has always been insistent and uncompromising in his policies — never indicating in the least a desire to invest his capital in other than film enterprises. Yet, as is stated elsewhere in the volume, it would not be surprising — even in the near future — if the George Kleine type of film magnate were to un