The photoplay; a psychological study (1916)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

INNER DEVELOPMENT OF PICTURES of the moving picture houses has increased. The picture house ought therefore to take up the task of the magazines which it has partly displaced. The magazines give only a small place to the news of the day, a larger place to articles in which scholars and men of public life discuss significant problems. Much American history ia the last two decades was deeply influenced by the columns of the illus- trated magazines. Those men who reached the millions by such articles cannot overlook the fact—they may approve or condemn it— that the masses of today prefer to be taught by pictures rather than by words. The audi- ences are assembled anyhow. Instead of feeding them with mere entertainment, why not give them food for serious thought? It seemiBd therefore a most fertile idea when the "Paramount Pictograph" was foimded to carry intellectual messages and ambitious discussions into the film houses. Political and economic, social and hygienic, technical and industrial, esthetic and scientific ques- tions can in no way be brought nearer to the grasp of millions. The editors will have to take care that the discussions do not degen- erate into one-sided propaganda, but so must 3 37