The photoplay; a psychological study (1916)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE PHOTOPLAY gered for a long while in the minds of all those who had a serious relation to art. It probably still prevails today among many, even if they appreciate the more ambitious efforts of the photoplaywrights in the most recent years. The philanthropic pleasure in the furnishing of cheap entertainment and the recognition that a certain advance has re- cently been made seem to alleviate the es- thetic situation, but the core of public opinion remains the same; the moving pictures are no real art. And yet all this arguing and all this hasty settling of a most complex problem is funda- mentally wrong. It is based on entirely mis- taken ideas concerning the aims and purposes of art. If those errors were given up and if the right understanding of the moving pic- tures were to take hold of the commimity, no- body would doubt that the chromo print and the graphophone and the plaster cast are in- deed nothing but inexpensive substitutes for art with many essential artistic elements left out, and therefore ultimately unsatisfactory to a truly artistic taste. But everybody would recognize at the same time that the re- lation of the photoplay to the theater is a 140