French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

tradition. At the same time, the Wire chai ose) film theory, despite its many shortcomings, was one ot the first to try to come to grips with the uniqueness of the film medium and to delineate an aesthetic of cinema. Just as Impressionist film style has had important influences on later film activity, so Impressionist theory defined a position which has affected theoretical disputation today. Most generally, perhaps this study will contribute something toward the understanding of larger issues in cinema study: the historical nature of a film movement, the extent and ciwatci ounce of stylistic -hemogeneity in a period, and the relation of film theory to film-making. In short, both the immediate impact and long-range significance of Impressionism justify an attempt to define and trace the historical development of the movement. Despite the cultural, theoretical, and stylistic importance of this movement, previous research in the area has not sought to define Impressionism as a movement. Indeed, most research in the area has been sparse and cursory. No study in English has examined the period in detail, either by consulting primary source material or by constructing a systematic period-scheme, and in no language does there exist a full-length treatise on a 2 i] . LJ Impressionism.’ In French, several historians have