French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

movement is seen as beginning around 1919 or 1920, nhitting its peak in 1923, and becoming effectively dispersed by 1924. But the historians who have made these claims have gathered so little evidence and have made so few distinctions and qualifications in the framing of these claims (e.g., the meaning of "subjective" film style) that we can hardly judge whether their account of the movement is valid or not. My study will show that while some of these assumptions are not supportable (e.g., the assumption that the movement ended in 1924), most are valid. In very general terms, previous historians are correct in assuming a fundamental unity in the Impressionist movement. I shall go further, however: by examining the activities, films, and theory of the movement more closely ‘than previous historians have done, I shall illuminate the movement in more detail than previous scholars have. In contradistinetion to previous work, then, this Study will concern itself with defining the homogeneity of the Impressionist movement. Biographical material will be used only when it contributes to establishing common traits of the members. It can be argued that I am blurring individual differences. The aforementioned historians, however, have made us well aware of such indi vidual differences; what we need now is a demonstration 6