Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

seen in a film, removing it from the material domain Ve occupies and placing it in the vague realm of dream and abstraction."9/ Perhaps most interesting is the possible vole OF cinema in a destruction of what some avant-gardists cons1 dered frozen and outdated aesthetic conventions: film gives us "reality." Georgette Leblanc, for example, wrote of a film: "Est ce de l'art? Qu'importe! Encore : ‘ gies the Qs une fois, c'est de la vie, et voila Ltessentiel."9° Delluc, whose entire theory of film, as we shall see, depends on a tension between realism and artcafrictadaity, claimed that "Le cinéma est justement un acheminement vers cette suppression de l'art qui dépasse l'art, éEtant.da vie."99 \Most @irect is this note of Soupault's: "One of the most definite qualities of the American influence resides in the close relationship between art and life. By way of contrast to this statement one might note that European art exists on a misunderstanding. It escapes from life in order to return to it by a detour. This is a symptom of age and a warning of decadence."199 Most probably, the attraction which the cinema held for many intellectuals and artists was a product of all these factors. What is important for our purposes is that the attraction did exist and that it provided a base of sup port for the cultural activities, theories, and filme (of