French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CHAPTER III. IMPRESSIONIST FILM THEORY Just as the period 1913-1925 saw a change in French intellectuals' and artists' attitude toward film, so did roughly the same years see the rise of a new theoretical perspective on the cinema. It is important that this perspective was generated, promulgated, and shared by virtually the same people who initiated and sustained a coherent film culture and who made a stylistically homogeneous set of films; that is, a distinct theory of film is an aspect of what I am designating as the ImpresSionist movement. Impressionist theory is not the specialist's ideal of theory-building. Nowhere can one find a sustained, rigorously mounted theoretical argument. Most ImpresSionist theory exists in two forms: scattered unsupported pronouncements on film aesthetics and implicit assumptions underlying: critical, historical, or polemical writings. Worse, the Impressionist writers betray little acquaintance with systematic philosophizing. Like many avant-garde move-_ ments, Impressionism had specific polemical and Artie. ยข goals, and these goals often tempted the writers +0 Sub stitute arp akne for earned positions. The result is a rough-and-ready assemblage of unacknowledged assumptions, casual opinions, and fragmentary aesthetic claims.