French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

94 turn and shall conclude with a general evaluation of the theory. The Nature of Art Although the Impressionists' ties to traditional aesthetics are rarely avowed, a clear aesthetic underlies their position. Broadly speaking, Impressionist film theory holds that art is expression. Like Romantic theories, the Impressionists assume that art resides in the transformation of nature by the imagination and that art yields not discursive truth but an experiential truth anchored in feelings. This concept of art as expression is extended to apply to the cinema. Several remarks scattered throughout Impressionist writing suggests that art is seen as the imaginative transpotnatiéh of nature. "Certainement, le cinéma part de la nature, comme tous les arts," writes Delluc. "Et comme tous les arts il doit interpréter la nature et la styliser et la recréer sous un angle visuel nouveau."1! Jean Epstein's writing on literary aesthetics testifies to a similar insistence on art as deviation from reality.° Canudo states the same assumption more clearly: "La peinture ne réproduit pas la nature, mais elle la compose avec un parti-pris."4 Similarly, Marcel Défosse defines art as