French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

98 more fundamental question enters: How can the artist's "expression" be known as such by a perceiver? That is, is not a private account of feeling driven either to mysticism or to solipsism? On the other hand, Impressionist claims about "expressiveness" suggest some sense in which the term "feeling" is ascribable to objects themselves. 16 What is this sense? And in what way can this feeling be justified as "truth"? Obviously, such questions as these are ingredient to a philosophical aesthetic, but Impressionism ignores them. It picks up from Symbolist doctrine what it needs to secure a general and unexamined premise concerning the nature of art, which may be formulated in this way: Art is the transformation of nature by the human imagination, evoking or suggesting feelings and presenting "truth" to such feelings. The Relation of Film to Traditional Arts Impressionist film theory assumes at the outset that film is a distinct art possessing creative possibilities which no other art possesses. Like so many other theoretical assumptions of the movement , this view emerges from a polemical context. Before 1920, several writers denied the cinema's artistic status on various grounds: