French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

102 "adaptation").29 Just as the synthetic strain in Impressionist theory owes something to Wagner's Gesamtkunstwerk aesthetic, so does the purist conception allude to much current debate on "pure poetry." In 1920, Valéry had written of an "absolute poetry" and later had identified the problem of such poetry as that "of knowing whether one can manage to construct one of those works which may be pure of all nonpoetic elements ."59 As we shall see in ae V, the Impressionists were not to take this premise to the logical conclusion that the members of the abstract-film movement did. Nonetheless, the debate over Hage aa in poetry | doubtless had some influence on Impressionist thinking. 31 The purist position's opposition of film and theatre consists essentially of a distinction between materials, thus inserting Impressionist film theory in the "integrity of materials" tradition so bieedoad. to modern movements like Cubism, Symbolism, and Constructivism. The Impressionist assumes that the theatre is a predominantly verbal medium, while the film is primarily visual. Delluc, who attacks the presence of inter-titles in films and sees in even Gance's titles a dangerous "Gongorism,"2¢ urges that the verbal material should play a minor role: "Le texte, redisons-le, ne doit pas @étre quand l'image peut le