Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

108 into the domain of the wondrous."49 This aura of wonder never quite leaves 2) Bel aire film theory. Even the most sophtetieatae theorists (e.g., Epstein and Canudo) fall back too easily upon the assumption that photogénie is an impenetrable, quasi-supernatural enigma. This means that much written about photogénie is unsupportable theoretically. The strongest theoretical line, however, pushes the argument into the ee the technical capacities of the image, but without losing sight of the awesome mystery that initially impels the inquiry. Photogénie is seen, most broadly, as the transforming, revelatory power of cinema: transforming because photogénie surpasses sheer literal reproduction of reality; revelatory because it presents a fresh perspective upon reality. The transforming quality must be present if there is to be art; as we have seen, Impressionist theory assumes art to be an imaginative, suggestive transformation of nature. "Le septiéme art," writes Canudo, "doit €voquer et suggérer les sentiments, et méme les faits, plus qu'il ne doit platement les reproduire."2" Louis | Aragon likewise observes that cinema's power lies not in the faithful reproduction of reality but in the "magnification" and "transformation" of reality which produces "la vie supérieure de la poésie."2! Epstein calls the