Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ing comme pour la premiére fois, toutes choses sous leur angle divin, avec leur profil de symbole et leur plus vaste sens d'analogie, avec un air de vie personnelle, telle est la grande joie du cinéma. In its hinting that ideal correspondences and analogies exist between the film image and Truth, this passage Suggests the nature of the absolute realm beyond appearances that cinema can reveal. Epstein takes to its logical end the Symbolist bias of Impressionist thought in identifying the transforming capacity of the film image with an ideal transcendance, a realm of pure ideas. He writes: Essentialement l'écran généralise et détermine. Tl n'y s'agit jamais d'un soir, mais du soir et le votre en fait partie. Le visage, et j'y retrouve tous ceux que j'ai vus, fant6me de souvenirs. Au lieu d'une bouche, la bouche, larve de baisers. Chaque image devient une abstraction, quelque chose de complet, de définitif et d'universel.©2 Here is the ultimate claim for photogénie as a transformation of material reality: we experience not a coneeptual abstraction but a nondiscursive, experiential symbol embodying a realm beyond immediate sense experience. To this realm, the artist has access and uses the art work to express his or her insights into this realm. In passing, we should note the astonishing variety of assumptions revealed in some passages quoted above; they constitute a bewildering compendium of variants of that broad position known as idealism. Delluc seems to opt for a reality which is stylized and idealized through