Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

115 an imposition is essential for the Impressionists. It is not enough to point the camera and turn it on, says Canudo; the mind of the artist must be expressed: "L'écraniste se doit de transformer la réalite 4 l'image de son réve intérieur."64 Similarly, for Germaine Dulac, although cinema's technical base is photography, its aesthetic function is to use technique for expression of the director's mind. 5 By implication, then, the film artist must somehow grasp the ideal realm beyond appearances and then utilize the techniques of cinema to reveal this ideal realm. This revelation of feeling (what Mallarmé might have called "&tats d'adme") is in turn grasped by the spectator. What are the technical capacities of the medium that Impressionism finds important for the revelation of mental states? Because of the ‘nega assumptions of cinema's transforming and revelatory powers and of cinema's distinctness from theatre, Impressionist theory emphasizes manipulation of the camera as the aesthetic basis of: photogénie. Here the theory again takes on a normative slant; since the eq neie can transform nature, it should do it primarily through camera technique (and not, say, primarily through mise-en-scéne, which is identified as a theatrical devioey., The split between profilmic event and filming, we recall, already stresses the