French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

119 Porte is asking that the artist's cinematic transformation of material reality move inadifferent direction, so to speak: that technique only imply the director's interpretation by indicating characters' visual experiences. Although Impressionist theory never gets beyond such general questioning, there is nonetheless the tacit recognition that camera placement can suggest subjective attitudes toward material reality. As we shall see, this possibility is actualized in Impressionist film practice. It is the camera, then, in its adjustments and positionings, that makes the primary contribution to photogénie as revelation and transformation. Mise-en-scéne (the arrangement of material in the image) is accorded considerably less importance, but occasional comments Suggest that Impressionist theorists are aware of its expressive potential. The usual assumption is that miseen-scéne contributed to the oe of absects, that, : the close-up facilitates. Nature, in other words, becomes a character. Canudo speaks of "nature-personnage" in the American and Swedish films.78 Delluc finds that cinema reveals an animating force in natural details: "Les choses dont le rdle est immense dans la vie et dans Ltart retrouveront leur vrai réle et leur éloquence fatidique."/9 Whereas Impressionist theory values distortions of camera work for expressive ends, however, it denies that distortion e