Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Le? possession of photogénie, which consists of the power of film techniques (chiefly camerawork) to express the film maker's vision of otherwise hidden meanings in veality. The Nature of Filmic Construction Soe eee A SL ONS UPUCE LON I suggested earlier that Impressionist film theory does not develop a fundamental conception of cinematie structures that? is, iti eidtistinpuishes film from other arts on material urDunltey not structural ones. This lack Surfaces again when Impressionist theory tries to define an’ aesthetic or Tilmic. construct ion.” The! result is’ a sketchy, problematic pair of normative concepts: first, a denial that cinematic structure should owe anything to aia ina tele or literary structure and, second, an assertion that filmic structure should be based on "visual rhythm." In their eagerness to establish cinema's unique aesthetic domain, many Impressionists go beyond the second proposition formulated above to claim not only that the basic material of film is moving images but also that film should not borrow its dramaturgy from other arts. Note that this is a contingent and normative claim. It is one thing to say that all films consist of moving images and possess some measure of photogénie. It is another thing to say that some films copy literary or theatrical