Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

a2% dramaturgy and that they should not do so. Although Impressionist writers have not earned a theory of autonomously cinematic structure comparable to the material concept of photogénie or "cineplastics," they usually simply deny that cinema should owe anything at all to theatre om ld terature.,. Jii‘pcetion, inte gue, desprit: sont du théatre...," writes Epstein. "Le cinéma assimile mal l'armature raisonnable du feuilleton."83 In another passage, Epstein claims: "Généralement, le cinéma rend mal 1'anecdote. Et ‘action dramatique' y est une erreur. "94 Germaine Dulac complains that a blind man in a film theatre could be told the plot of most films and miss very little: "Un vrai film ne doit pas pouvoir se raconter puisqu'il doit puiser son principe actif et émotif dans des images faites d'uniques vibrations visuelles. Raconte-t-on un tableau? Raconte-t-on une sculpture? Certes pas. On ne peut €voquer que l'impression et 1'émotion qu'telles dégagent.185 Fauré and Clair maintain that because of cineplastics, a story becomes but a pretext for the images, 36 Consequently, Impressionists often deny that a "pure film" should be a narrative at al1.87 Again, the borrowing from purist conceptions of literature is probabite. If Impressionist theory decides that cinematic