French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

form should ideally owe nothing to literary or dramatic form, what does cinematic form consist of? This is perhaps the greatest problem in Impressionist film theory. Needing a model of temporal structure, refusing the model offaved by narrative forms, and unable or unwilling to generate a theory of uniquely cinematic structure, the ImpresSionist theorist looks to music for analogues for filmic construction. Interestingly, musical forms generated by motivic play (e.g., sonata form) are not seen as the prime models, 88 What is borrowed from music is the concept of rhythm. Impressionist theory rests its idea of filmic construction almost wholly upon the rhythmic relationships between images. Unanimous in praising rhythm in cinema, Impressionist writers never consider the concept closely. Gance announces, unhelpfully, that rhythm makes cinema the music) of light .89 Moussinac proposes that rhythm is a need of the mind: we live ina bowsy and psychic rhythm. 909 Most precise of any is René Clair, who notes that three factors control cinematic rhythm--the duration of each image, the organization of shots in editing, and movement within each image--but he goes no further.?! It is not at all clear, then, how rhythmic relations between images can adequately define cinematic structure. In