Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

sum, rhythm receives not even the theoretical exploration that photogénie does. As we might formulate it, the final assumption of Impressionist theory is eS Ay ReneS normative, and problematic: Filmic construction should be based not on narra tive but on rhythmic relations between images. Evaluation As I suggested at the outset of this chapter, one of the problems posed by Impressionist theory is that it never received systematic large-scale explication. The belletristic and scrappy quality of the Impressionists! writings encouraged avoidance of detailed and systematic analysis; hence a number of glaring conceptual gaps in the theory. Apart from the flaws I have discussed in pasSing, one general defect is the failure to posit a comprehensive theory of structure appropriate to the nature of the medium. This would not be so problematic if ImpresSionist theory did not insist on the autonomous purity not only of the matertals: of film but also of the structures of film. The shift from descriptive claims about the medium to normative claims about structure marks, among other things, an inability to account descriptively for an intrinsically cinematic structure. Another gap in