Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Impressionist theorizing is the lack of an explicit account of the experience of film and of experience in general. Without an epistemology or a psychology, Impressionist theory's account of photogénie cannot adequately explain > how the film image reveals and transforms reality. An epistemology drawn from Bergson or a psychology along Gestalt lines might start to ground Impressionist film theory, but the choice between these positions is hardly an indifferent one, and the eoncepts of revelation and transformation would then demand much more analysis than the Impressionists ever give euve: In short, as Impressionist theory stands, it is unfinished, only a rough sketch of a complete theory. | Besides such cracks in its theoretical anatomy, the Impressionist position suffers from at least two purely logical defects. There is, first, the move from an account of cinema's basic nature to normative recommendations about film style. The problem of how to justify a shift from descriptive to prescriptive propositions--how to get from "is" to "ought"--is a classic one in logic, aesthetics, and ethics; how to solve it remains a theoretical difficulty. A second problem lies in the nature of the normative argument from the alleged "purity of the medium." In film, the problems of scope attending such purism have