Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

140 definition, there is apparently no single stylistic ifeature | which, taken alone, constitutes a necessary and sufficient condition for including a film in what trained observers would agree to be the class of Impressionist films. For example, rhythmic editing in a film of the period would be an indication that the film might belong to the Impres— sionist class. But such a trait is not a sufficient condition because there are films (e.g., Symphonie Diagonale, Ballet Mécanique) which use rhythmic editing but which virtually all scholars would not call Impressionist. Nor is rhythmic editing a necessary condition, since experts would include certain films (e.g., Rose-France, La Femme de Nulle Part) in the class of Impressionist works despite their lack of rhythmic editing. The model I have chosen instead is that of socalled "family resemblances." At the conclusion of Wittgenstein's famous analysis of the concept of "rame," he | characterizes the nature of the similarities he has discovered not as common traits but rather as "a complicated network of similarities overlapping and crisscrossing: sometimes overall similarities, sometimes similarities of detail." Wittgenstein's family-resemblance concept can help us understand how trained observers have perceived features of films as coalescing into a significant stylistic