French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

187 cards--subjectivity at another remove, by means of the film-maker's metaphor for a character's feelings. Although editing that stresses flashbacks and fantasy is quite typical of Impressionist style, neither is distinctive: several non-Impressionist narrative films examined utilize either type of temporal relations (especlally flashbacks in L'Atlantide and fantasy in Nana). Nonetheless, such editing patterns contribute toward making Impressionist temporal editing "subjective" in Mitry's first sense--i.e., expressing purely mental images. Spatial Relations Between Shots A sequence of shots may deal with one homogeneous block of space or several heterogenous blocks of space. As Burch points out, the standard cinematic practice in the first case is to show the entire block of space in one shot and then to allow successive shots to break up the space into significant details. This is the dominant procedure in Impressionist film style as well. Occasionally, however, the spatial whole will not be decomposed by the succession of shots but rather composed, built up, by them. This means that several shots of spatial parts will indicate a spatial whole instead of that Spatial whole being indicated in one shot. For example,