French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

189 the subsequent dramatic action. Such an editing pattern, while fairly rare in Impressionist films (occuring in only five films), occurs in no non-Impressionist film examined. Far more central to the editing of spatial relations in Impressionist films is a specific pattern of cutting within a spatial whole which follows a character's act of looking at something. The typical sequence is this: 1. Shot of character looking offscreen. 2. Shot of object or person looked: at, seen Drom character's point-of-view. 3. Shot, as 1 of character reacting. Film students will recognize this as similar to the famous "Kuleshov effect," so-called because of the Russian filmmaker's experiments with "creative geography" (although accounts do not specify if shot 2 was a point-of-view Shot. in his tests). Thais editing pattern is important for French Impressionism in several respects. First, the pattern is pervasive; no fewer than thirty-two out of thirtyfive Impressionist films contain instances of it. Second, the pattern is very distinctive; out of the fifteen nonImpressionist films examined, only three contain instances of it. Third, the pattern includes another characteristic element of Impressionist film style: the optically subjec tive point-of-view shot.. Finally, as in the case of flash back and fantasy editing