French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

rea ie by the accelerating pace of the dance itself and by an occasional tracking shot, but not by any rhythmic editing; the spatial unity of the sequence is dominant. In Kean, the hero executes a drunken dance in a tavern, which is presented entirely in rhythmically accelerated editing: quick panning shots of Kean are intercut with quick panning shots around the other dancers; there are fragmentary close-ups of dancers' feet, clapping hands, Kean's face, and bottles emhAdne on a shelf. As the pace of the dance builds, the shots get shorter and shorter until the dancers. collapse from exhaustion. The use of rhythmic editing to present a scene as the characters experience it, entirely absent from Nana, occurs elsewhere in Kean (notably in the scene of his drunken visions). On the whole, then, the Style paradigm reveals that although Nana does contain some features of Impressionist style, they are very few in number and not particularly strong in quality, and the absence of certain highly characteristic features (optically Subjective moving-camera shots, elaborate optical effects, glance/object editing, and rhythmic editing) suggests that Nana is not properly classified as an Impressionist film--a judgement which most commentators on Nana have implicitly assumed.’ Kean, on the other hand, belongs firmly to the Impressionist style.