Start Over

French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

manipulation that was central to the Impressionist films. The films of DeMille, Sjostrom, Stiller, and the Germans typically made mise-en-scéne the central creative factor; pictorial qualities and meanings were dependent upon the manipulation of light, setting, costume, and spatial arrangement--"naturalistic" in the Swedish films. slight ly stylized in DeMille's work, and radically distorted in the German films. Even Ince and Griffith, whose styles placed more emphasis on editing, were praised by the Impressionists chiefly for their mise-en-sc€ne. The pictorial qualities of the foreign films, Linea not of the same order as the optical effects, subjective viewpoint shots, and camera manipulation characteristic of the Impressionist work of the time. Foreign influence was doubtless a strong initial motivating factor, but it was mediated by the ideology of the movement. Although foreign films often Sparked theoretical and polemical argument, the Impressionist movement's writings in the 1918-1922 period offer a more immediate explanation of the change in the film style. Theoretical and polemical work at the time not only responded directly to the French work and the foreign imports but also generated ideas that could be pursued in film practice. In this respect, Delluc's journals and polemical works seem crucial. Le Film, Journal de Ciné-Club, CO nN — a (a ee and Cinéa, as well as Delluc's books Cinéma et Cie and