French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

238 films, and the work of Delluc, Gance, L'Herbier, Dulac, and Epstein), became, according to René Clair; “the manifesto of a new generation of film-makers."42 > In Moussinaec's Subsequent chapters, the influences are apparent and the landscape is familiar. Moussinae argues for the cinema as an autonomous art with its own laws and is particularly careful to distinguish it from theatre. He locates filmie beauty less in the subject than in the plasties of the image. He summarizes Delluc and Epstein on photogénie, establishes technique as the foundation of cinematic beauty, and cata of) logues cinema's expressive technical devices. He see the story as a pretext ror the images. He conceives of rhythm as a structural factor and suggests analogies between musical and cinematic rhythm. The book econeludes with a survey of American, Swedish, German, and French films, citing the by-now canonized films praised in the journals and regularly screened in the ciné-clubs and speclalized theatres. In sum, Naissance du Cinéma demonstrates that by 1925, the aesthetic position of the movement had been codified, a conelusion which vindicates those historians who dub Impressionism "the avant-garde of 1925." It is also significant that no new concepts were added to Impressionist film theory peribe athe: 1925) The Impressionist film style continued after 1924