French Impressionist Cinema: Film Culture, Film Theory, and Film Style (December 1974)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ge: ta | independently wealthy Jean Renoir began financing his own first film. In 1926, Dulac broke with commercial films to make films on her own, Epstein founded his own company (Les Films de Jean Epstein), and Kirsanov premiered his film Menilmontant, made entirely free of studio economies. Although working for the commercial system had given the Impressionists enough maneuvering room for their experiments to coalesce into a unified style, freedom from that system encouraged each to pursue idiosyncratic lines of stylistie interest. The stylistic diffusion of ‘the movement Bi. tite years after 1925 is thus partly attributable to the greater degree of production freedom gained by the Impressionist film-makers. Related to this factor is the growth of specialized theatres in the years 1924-1929, a phenomenon which provided an alternative financial base for experimental production. An independent film could get at least a few screenings at Tedesco's Vieux Colombier or Tallier's Stadio des Urselines. The effect was twofold. First, the film was likely to be a short one, chiefly because of the smaller amount of money invested in the production. Thus the conditions of the market for screening caused most Impressionists (like their counterparts in other avant-garde movements) to make much shorter films than they had previously.