The educational screen (c1922-c1956])

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

168 The Educational Screen The Basis of Visual Instruction WHAT is the true basis of the visual method of instruction? Unlesi this basis is quite definitely determined we are almost certain t( miss in a large measure the benefits to be derived from the us< of visual aids. Much is being said these days about interest. To run over our curren pedagogical writings one would be inclined at first to conclude that inter est is a newly discovered factor in education. As a matter of fact interes is as old as the race and the satisfying of interest has always been a lead ing stimulus to effort. Modern conditions doubtless give freer play to individual initiative but voluntary effort has always followed the direction of real interest. Again, there is a vast difference between stimuli that induce involun tary response of a superficial character and those that lead to sustainec purposeful effort. Those who are more concerned with ultimate rathe: than immediate results will seek to secure true visualizations and will no be satisfied with what amounts to little more than sensory impressions. Undoubtedly before pictorial forms of expression became common people generally gained clear notions of things and acquired ability t< make sound judgments. By the time they learned to read language readib they had through experience gained familiarity with many types of thing and through memory and imagination under the stimulus of languagi expression were able to visualize unseen combinations. Such menta ability still remains.. The distinctive merit of pictures in education lies in their concreteness They express somewhat directly and may express accurately the funda mental facts to be perceived; namely, form, size, position, color and motior These classes of facts are essential for all general ideas. All judgment and conclusions grow out of an analysis and synthesis of percepts. Every picture is specific. A general truth may be illustrated by picture; it is never expressed by one. To make known a judgment, state a conclusion, to express a general notion a picture is useless; languag alone is adequate. The field of usefulness of pictures, then, is confined directly to objects to things physical. Indirectly there is some further use for them, bu the fact must be faced that they are not adequate for universal use f education. Doubtless for their special province, if wisely chosen an intelligently used, they are of very great value. it