Education by Radio (1932)

Page scan 00070 from Education by Radio

Record Details:

Title:
Education by Radio
Date:
1932
Publisher:
Washington D.C. : National Committee on Education by Radio (U.S.)
Volume:
Education by radio (1932)
Leaf #:
00070
Language:
English
Collection:
Broadcasting & Recorded Sound
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Date Added:
July 11, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

The Ideals of a Great Citizen WILLI AM HOW ARD TAFT, according to an article by Mark Sullivan, had ac¬ cumulated no private means when he left the Presidency. “It was open to him and he was solicited to unite with some of the greatest law firms in New York. Taft declined. He said that as President it had happened to fall to him to appoint about 60 percent of all the district, circuit, and Supreme Court justices on the United States bench. He could not, he said, appear before his own appointees as an advocate in private litigation. And he accepted the small remuneration of a teacher at Yale University. This action is in striking contrast to the for¬ mer members and employees of the Federal Radio Commission who have taken positions with the radio monopolies which they had previously been obliged to deal with as mem¬ bers of the Commission, thus placing them¬ selves in a situation where the information they gained as public servants may be used for private advantage contrary to the public interest. [ 56]