Film and education; a symposium on the role of the film in the field of education ([1948])

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE FILM LIBRARY ries7 are evidence of a felt need to achieve such a network; to decentralize services; to get film supply nearer the user; and to reduce the time consumed in transit. An efficient distribution system involves three elements: (1) a strong state or regional film center; (2) film sub-centers serving smaller areas within the territory of the first-named library; and (3) strong local programs involving county or city school film libraries. Whatever the character of the distribution system, each college or university film library would do well to consider itself as an ultimate part of such a distribution system; to participate in the kind of planning involved in the state programs described in Chapter 31; and to shape its own distribution policies accordingly. With the development of statewide and local programs, it is probable that the character and functions of the university and college library will be modified considerably There is further need for university and college film libraries to assume their share of responsibility in promoting school-owned film libraries. Film producers have in the past been sharply critical of university and college film libraries because, it was claimed, these libraries, unable themselves to buy heavily enough to establish a stable film market, paid only lip service to the idea of school-owned films and tended by their mere existence to reduce sales to schools. It is doubtful that this statement can be taken seriously as a general indictment, but true or not, the criticism points up the obligation of the film libraries to promote local film ownership. Such promotion is not only a professional obligation to the field, but it reacts to the benefit of the libraries themselves. In general, the more films school systems buy, the more they rent. A little bolder experimentation in distribution on the part of film libraries might reveal techniques of increasing print activity. One film library reported plans for circuiting 7 Three existing branch libraries are reported in the survey. [517]