Independent Exhibitors Film Bulletin (Sep 1935 - Aug 1936)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

AND IIP INDENT EXHIBITOR: FILM BULLETIN VOL. 2 No. 14 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1935 PRICE 10 CENTS THE PHILADELPHIA MERCER There has never been any disagreement with the view that Philadelphia, like any other film territory, should have one unified exhibitor organization, rather than two antagonistic bodies pulling against each other and thus, indirectly, benefiting only their common foe. The point of dispute between the IEPA and the MPTO has always been about the type of organization the unified body should be. Both of these groups have in their ranks many responsible and respected exhibitors. The bar between them has been the membership of producer-owned theatres in one group and their exclusion from the other. Under the present plan for merging the two groups, this bar is being lifted — but not removed. Affiliated theatres are to be admitted to the new organization, after which they are to be presented by the independent members with a set of grievances for adjustment. Failure of the affiliates to correct the alleged abuses will result in their banishment. Granting that the committees which arrived at this plan faced certain problems unknown to us, it seems that the procedure is perverse. Would it not be the wiser plan for the combined groups of independents to present their list of grievances to the affiliated circuits prior to admitting them to membership? It may prove embarrassing to try to kick them down the stairs so soon after shaking their hand in welcome. But, on the other hand, the answer to any objection to an elastic scheme for merging the two bodies may be this: If the independent exhibitors of the Philadelphia territory desire an organization controlled by them and they are willing to support it, no one can stop them from having it! Mo Wax.