The Film Daily (1919)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

EVOLUTION Eighteen months ago I stopped PROGRAM RELEASES because I thought the Program had outlived its usefulness to distributors and producers, and was a hindrance to exhibitors. Last November, I closed out my BRANCH EXCHANGES. The system of distribution through a chain of exchanges scattered throughout the United States, owned and managed by a New York or Chicago concern, is unavoidably and inherently WASTEFUL. One company reports an expenditure for film DISTRIBUTION in 1918 of approximated FOUR MILLION DOLLARS. If that company had thirty branches the average operating cost was $133,000.00 per branch, or about $2,500.00 weekly for each exchange, large and small. Suppose each of these branch exchanges had been owned by its branch manager and a few of his assistants; suppose they had had for distribution the same stock of films. Would the INCOME have been less? Would the operating EXPENSE have been as great? The answers are clear and point but one way. The TREND OF DISTRIBUTION is toward the exchange OWNED either partly or wholly by those actively in charge. This rule is working as surely as the law of gravity. There are such exchanges in existence, hardly known to the gentlemen who sit at the executive tables in New York, which are prosperous because they achieve the EFFICIENCY that comes through INTENSIVE work, INTIMATE knowledge of conditions and PERSONAL acquaintanceship with customers ; and most important, because they have the great INCENTIVE that comes from the OWNERSHIP of one's business. I want to form a close business intimacy with an independent exchange in every principal city in the United States. Where necessary I will assist in establishing new exchanges with films or cash. In either case I want to be associated with experienced film men who are STRAIGHT, ENERGETIC and COMPETENT Who will put every ounce of their ability into the running of the exchange Who can be depended upon to be SQUARE with exhibitors as well as themselves. I would prefer to deal with men who have sufficient means to partly finance the operating expenses of their exchange while it is being placed upon a sound footing, but PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS are more important than finances. I have it in mind to acquire an interest in such exchanges. In writing, mark letters "Personal and Confidential." 63 East Adams St. Chicago