The film daily year book of motion pictures (1935)
Reading and Downloading:
Record Details:
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!
Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.
Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.
View OCR Text
We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
Case 2
11
86
91
134
136
210 232
233
234
235
236
LOS ANGELES EXCHANGE
■ Board — Complainants and Respondents— Gr.— Cirstrand Theaters, Ltd.. Garfield Theater, Alhambra, Calif., vs. Principal Theaters and Fox West Coast Theaters (Alhambra and El Rev Theaters), Los Angeles, Cahl. (Article VI, Part 2, Section 1— Overbiiymg.) Gr— H. M. Popkin, 448 So. Main Street, Los Angeles, Cal., vs. Mr Abe Levy, Mr. O. L. Mitchell and Mr. F. L. Titus, Los Angeles, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 [b] — Maintaining minimum price oi admission.) ^ , , , „
Gr. — John T. Rennie vs. M. Feldstein and i*. Dietrich. (Article V-E, Part 6— Interference with lease.) ^ .„ „,
Or. — Pacific National Theater, Seville 1 heater, Los Angeles, vs. Jay-Ben Corp. and Harry Goldfarb, National City, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Sections 1, 2 and 3 — Reduced admissions.)
Gr.— Cirstrand Theaters, Ltd., Garfield Theater and Granada Theater vs. Alhambra Amusement Company and Fox West Coast Theaters Corp. and Principal Theaters, Inc., Alhambra and El Rey Theaters. (Article VE, Part 3, Section 1 — Reduced admissions.) Gr. — Colcata Corporation, Colorado Theater, by L. L. Bard, Pasadena, Calif., vs. United West Coast Theaters Corp. and United Artists Theaters Circuit, Inc., and Fox West Coast Theaters Corp. (Article VI, Part 2, Section 1 — Overbuying.)
Gr. — Mrs. Jenne H. Dodge, Mission Theater, Ventura, Calif., vs. Fox West Coast Theaters Corp.< American Amusement Company, Principal Theaters, Inc., Ventura Theater, Ventura, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Bank night.)
Gr. — John T. Rennie and Son, Rennie Theater, San Fernando, Calif., vs. Feldstein and Dietrich, San Fernando Theater, San Fernando, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1— Bank night.)
C. & Z. — Protests from various exhibitors against clearance and zoning. (Schedule.) Gr. — Mrs. Jennie H. Dodge, Mission Theater, Ventura, Calif., vs. Oxnard Theater Co. (Feldstein & Dietrich), Oxnard Theater, Oxnard, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Bank night.)
Gr. — Mrs. Jennie H. Dodge, Mission Theater, Ventura, Calif., vs. Fox San Palo Theater Corp., Glen City Theater, Santa Faula, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Bank night.) Gr. — Dick Lemucchi, Rialto Theater, Bakersfield, Calif., vs. G. W. Page, Granada Theater, Bakersfield, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Reduced admissions.) Gr. — C. A. Ferry, Granada Theater, Alhambra, Calif., vs. O. W. Lewis, Mission Theater, San Gabriel, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Bank night.) Gr.— M. E. Baylis, Tivoli Theater, West Los Angeles, Calif., vs. Dusern and Seal, Wilshire Theater, Santa Monica, Calif. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Bank night.)
MEMPfflS EXCHANGE
Case; Board — Complainants and Respondents — 17.1 C. & Z. — Protests against existing clearance and zoning of Memphis. (Schedule.)
MILWAUKEE EXCHANGE
Case; Board — Complainants and Respondents — 1 Gr. — Saxe Amusement Management, Inc., vs. Ashley Theater Corporation and Vitagraph, Inc. (Article VI, Part 2, Section 1— Overbuying.) .
6 Gr. — Wisconsin Amusement Enterprises Corporation, Carpenter Building, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, vs. George Hannon, Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Article V-E, Part S, Paragraph [c] — Unfair advertising.)
7 Gr. — LaCrosse Theaters Company and Kayess Theaters Company, LaCrosse, Wisconsin, vs.
L J. Burkitt, Classic Theater, Sparta, Wisconsin. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 3— Reduced admissions.) 31 Gr. — Langheinrich Brothers, Burleigh Street Theater, Milwaukee, Wis., vs. Saxe Amusement Management, Inc., Garfield Theater. Milwaukee. (Article V-E, Part 3, Sections 1, 2, 3 — Reduced admissions.) g2 Gr.— L. F. Thurwachter, Park and Avon Theaters, Waukesha, Wis., vs. United Artists Corp. (Milwaukee Branch). (Article V, Part 6, Section F — 10 per cent cancellation clause.) 151 C. & Z. — Protest against existing clearance and zoning in Milwaukee territory. (Schedule.)
200 Gr. — George Fischer, Vogue Theater, Kenosha, Wis., vs. Hugo Vogel and Sam Levinson, Butterfly Theater, Kenosha, Wisconsin. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Reduced admissions.)
269 Gr. — AtanasofT Bros., World Theater, Milwaukee, Wis., vs. United Artists, First National, Warner Bros., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, RKO Dist. Corp., Fox Film Corp. and Gem Theater, Milwaukee, Wis. (Article VI, Part 2, Section 1 — Overbuying.)
MINNEAPOLIS EXCHANGE
Case ; Board — Complainants and Respondents — 244 Gr. — C. P. Knudsen, State Theater, Watertown, South Dakota, vs. Minnesota Amusement Co., Colonial and Lyric Theaters, Watertown, South Dakota. (Article VI, Part 2, Sections 1 [c and d] — Tying up of product.)
257 Gr. — Lake Amusement Company, Lake Theater, Minneapolis, Minn., vs. Charon & Levy, Heights Theater, Columbia Heights. Minn. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 7 — Reduced admissions.)
258 Gr. — Lake Amusement Company, Lake Theater, Minneapolis, Minn., vs. H. Dickerman, Alhambra Theater, Minneapolis, Minn. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Reduced admissions.)
259 Gr. — Lake Amusement Company, Lake Theater, Minneapolis, Minn., vs. Harry Dickerman, South Town Theater, Minneapolis, Minn. (Article V-E, Part 3, Section 1— Reduced adrtissions.)
260 Gr. — Lake Amusement Company, Lake Theater, Minneapolis, Minn., vs. H. Dickerman, Northtown Theater, Minneapolis, Minn. (Article _ V-E, Part 3, Section 1 — Reduced admissions.)
NEW HAVEN EXCHANGE
Case ; Board — Complainants and Respondents —
43 C. & Z. — Harry L. Lavietes, The Pequot Theater, New Haven, Conn., vs. Lyric Theater, State Theater, Garden Theater, New Haven, Conn.
44 C. & Z. — Middletown Enterprises, Inc. (Capitol, Palace and Middlesex Theaters, Middletown, Conn., vs. Capitol Theaters, Hartford, Conn.
45 C. & Z. — Jadams Amusement Corporation (Colonial Theater, Southington, Conn.), vs. Warner Bros., Strand and Capitol Theaters, New Britain, Conn. ; Ricci's Capitol Theater and Poli New England Theaters, Inc. ; Palace and Poli, Meriden, Conn. ; Warner Bros., Cameo, Bristol, Conn.
52 Gr. — Whalley Theater Company, Inc., Wlialley Theater, New Haven, Conn., vs. Paramount Pictures Distributing Company, Inc.. New Haven, Conn. (Article V-D, Part 5— Forcing of shorts with features.)
103 C. & Z.— Dr. Jacob B. Fishman (The Lawrence Theater Company, New Haven, Conn.), vs. Annex Theater, New Haven, et al.
104 C. & Z. — 1. Charles Repass (Crown Theater, Hartford, Conn.), vs. Regal Theater, Hartford, et al.
2. Riv-Lee Company (Rivoli Theater, Hartford), vs. Warner Brothers, Colonial and Lyric Theaters, Hartford.
631