FilmIndia (Dec 1937 - Apr 1938)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Tutluation Office ; 104, Apollo St., Bombay PHONE : 28752 Calcutta OffU> : 183, Dharamtalla Street £on?ou Office 145, Wardour Street, London W.I. jatntription Inland Rs. 4/Burma &■ Foreign Rs. 7/ filniimlia Editor BJIBURAO PATEL Dol 3 JAI1UARQ 1938 No 9 PRODUCERS OR BLACKMAILERS? 9(: AVE you ever heard of synthetic black mail? Well, you ought to know it by now if you have been following the fortunes of the Indian film industry. Synthetic blackmail is not the real product, but it has in it enough semblance of the real stuff to distinguish it from honest business. It is synthetic because it is practised by amateurs. It is a pity that some of our producers have taken up this new vocation of practising synthetic blackmail especially where our film journals are concerned. The recently formed Indian Motion Picture Producers" Association seems to have provided some of the producers with an excuse for putting the screw upon the several film journals when these journals dare to express any candid opinion about men and things in the industry. Not that the Association is in any way directly responsible for this new racket. In fact, the Association would condemn any such practice if it was brought to the notice of the Executive Committee.