FilmIndia (May-Dec 1938)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

May 1938 FILMINDIA system in production, a lamentable mismanagement all-round, extravagant expenditure, have all contributed to the downfall of the industry. From the very beginning, British pictures have been poor imitations of American pictures, and have never been popular with the British public. That is why the ■quota system was introduced, whereby a certain percentage of pictures exhibited in Britain had to be British. This is an eloquent comment on the quality of the product. Since the advent of the talkies, the British director has found his work simplified. He bodily transports stage successes to the screen, for the camera has only a photographic, and not a cinematic use for him. He has no idea of universal appeal in his pictures. Crude and Devoid of Soul The financial backing to the British industry has always been unlimited. Just before the crash, several banks had advanced huge sums oi money to the producers (only to lose practically all of it.) The technical equipment of the sudios has been of the highest quality. In fact, the British producer has had the benefit of everything — finance, equipment, a protective measure. And yet the average "All British" picture Is so crude in content and so devoid of soul that it is unfit for public exhibition. It can entertain only drunken, homesick Englishmen overseas. Paul Rotha, an English critic, in his excellent book "The Film Till Now" says, while speaking of British films, "British studios are filled with persons of moderate intelligence who are afraid of any new process in case their feeble mentality is not sufficiently clever to gTasp its significance. The very few mediocre pictures coming out of British studios are anything but British, for most of the stars, directors and technical staff are either American, German or French. To those who bluster that London will soon become a Super Hollywood, the following facts and figures about the British film industry, from the "News of the World" England, might be of interest: "The industry normally employs 10,000 people Of these 10,000, at least 8,000 skilled technicians, cameramen, carpenters, small part players and 'extras' are now out of work. There are 30 British studios, most of which are standing idle, maintained by skeleton staffs, or in some cases deserted. There are 80 stages , but less than a dozen are at present being used. Association of Cine Technicians: "Of our 750 members engaged in the studios, at least 600, are out of work." Had not Anglo-India better do something in the matter? \ Surendra and Bibbo that singing pair gives some marvellous music in "Gramaphone Singer" a Sagar picture directed bv Mr. Virendra Desai. 53