FilmIndia (May-Dec 1938)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

October 1938 FILM1NDIA that we hear are true. Without going into smallei details, let us ask some questions to the Executive Committee of the Society, regarding their recent publication of Indian Cinematograph Year Book. 1. Mr. Haribhai Desai was the original editor of the Indian Cinematograph Year Book and he had edited the said book which was published by the Society and even copies were sent out to a few people. How is that Mr. Desai's name does not appear on the book as the Editor? 2. Some of the copies of the Year Book as originally published, to be accurate, printed, were hastily withdrawn from the recipients. Why? Was it because Mr. Desai, editor No. 1 had written certain irresponsible remarks about several personalities in the Indian film industry? Who sat in judgment over his work and labelled it as irresponsible to deserve a hasty withdrawal? 3. What amount exactly did the Society lose as a result of this "irresponsible" work by way of reprinting and loss of paper? Is it true that the Society had to spend Rs. 2,500 extra? 4. Is it true that some of the members of the staff of the Society had brought it to the notice of the Hony. Secretary, the wisdom of appointing Mr. Desai as Editor when he had no previous experience of a job of this nature? Is it also true that the Secretary did not pay any attention to this recommendation? 5. After the still-born first edition of the Year Book why was Mr. B. D. Bharucha appointed editor of the second edition of the Year Book? How was Mr. Bharucha qualified to do this editorial job? The job was a big affair considering that it cost Rs. 8,000. Has Mr. Bharucha ever done journalism or edited a book of this nature? 6. Is it true that the Society owes a lot of money to several creditors, and is not in a position to meet these payments? If so why? The Society must be having a fixed revenue within which it can certainly manage its expenses. Some one must answer these questions. We can't find anyone better at the present moment than Rai Saheb Chuni Lall, the new acting President of the Society. Being a responsible man we are confident that Rai Saheb Chuni Lall will look into this matter seriously even at the risk of his very valuable time and once for all organize the Society on new lines. I / have seen many a stunt pictures, but wait till you see JAYABHARAT MOVIETONES SMASHING STUNT PICTURE O o 4* PAD/HA DEVI the colour Queen in the stellar role with S \> I SI 1 ISt I A the stunt King Supplied by .— Nurjehan, S. Baburao, Manchi Thoothi. Bookings ohm i CURAT FILM CIRCUIT Dadar Main Rd., BOMBAY-14 A