Handbook of projection for theatre managers and motion picture projectionists ([1922])

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MANAGERS AND PROJECTIONISTS 287 SUFFICIENT TIME TO MAKE REPAIRS THE EXCHANGE MAY BE EXCUSED, PROVIDED IT PLACES IN THE BOX WITH THE FILMS A CARD STATING THAT THE FILMS HAVE NOT BEEN EXAMINED AND REPAIRED, AND INSTRUCTING THE PROJECTIONIST TO MAKE REPAIRS, SENDING TO THE EXCHANGE HIS BILL FOR THE SERVICE. BY NO STRETCH OF IMAGINATION CAN IT BE DEEMED THE DUTY OF THE PROJECTIONIST TO REPAIR FILMS RECEIVED FROM AN EXCHANGE, AND WHEN, IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, IT IS NECESSARY FOR HIM TO DO SO, HE HAS THE PERFECT RIGHT TO EXPECT TO BE PAID BY THE EXCHANGE, AT A REASONABLE RATE PER HOUR, FOR HIS SERVICE, SINCE HE IS NOT A FILM INSPECTOR AND REPAIR MAN, BUT A PROJECTIONIST. PERFECT PROJECTION IS IMPOSSIBLE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT UNLESS THE FILM BE ITSELF IN PERFECT MECHANICAL CONDITION, AND A FILM IS NOT IN PERFECT MECHANICAL CONDITION WHEN IT HAS WIDE, STIFF, OR LOOSE SPLICES, MISFRAMES, STRAINED OR RIPPED SPROCKET HOLES RAIN, ETC., OR WHERE ITS SURFACE IS SMEARED WITH OIL. THESE FAULTS ARE PROLIFIC SOURCES OF POOR SCREEN RESULTS. m ZT" 1 I t _<.-.. •;~^5 •ft • fi.&AJ • • 9 Figure 80. It is a well known fact that many film exchanges make only the most superficial inspection of film, and either very little or no repairs at all. The underlying cause of this is, we believe, an endeavor by film exchanges to get too much work out of the film, coupled with a deliberate attempt on the part of the exchange to force the projectionist to do