Hands of Hollywood (1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

The Future of Pictures Of course the public is the czar of motion pictures, and rightly so. It is both stupid and unfair for writers to condemn the public for not appreciating their wares, because the public has the right to purchase the kind of entertainment it prefers. After all, it is the money of the public which builds the theaters, produces the pictures and plays, turns the presses of the publishing houses, and gives the successful artists their livelihood. The artist, the author, the actor, the director, the musician, has the right to buy the type of automc bile, home, clothing, etc., which suits his fancy; the public has the same right, whether it be purchasing raiment or entertainment. Therefore, if the public should wish nothing but talking pic tures, the public must be served. But the real artist will know tears should the silent picture be relegated to oblivion. [109]