Harvard business reports (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

330 HARVARD BUSINESS REPORTS when applied to specific situations. Whether this fact would seriously disrupt the use of such percentages became an important consideration. A method which achieved results identical to those of the foregoing procedure was employed by a distributor who leased pictures on a percentage basis whenever possible. He sought to determine what percentage an exhibitor's average film rental was of his average gross receipts. He then attempted to persuade the exhibitor to play pictures on a percentage basis, using this average film rental percentage as the share of gross receipts which should go to the distributor, commencing with the first dollar received. Application of this method to the example given above shows that the rental of $300 would be 25% of the gross receipts of $1,200. Whatever the total in'come was, 25% of it would go to the distributor. If it were $1,740, the rental would be $435, as under the former method. No guaranty and no splits beyond a certain gross figure were involved in this arrangement and to this extent the basis of pricing was simplified. If exhibitors accurately set the percentage which their average rentals bore to average gross receipts, the necessity of estimating the additional income which sound pictures would yield was eliminated. Under this plan, also, both the distributor and the exhibitor shared in the success or failure of a picture beginning with the very first dollar of receipts. The sales manager questioned the use of such a scheme on the ground that it involved persuading the exhibitor to play on a percentage basis but did not include the usual flat guaranty and split above a certain gross amount which such agreements regularly included. It was his belief that when an exhibitor did not have to guarantee a certain return to the distributor, the inclination was not to use aggressive sales promotion but to let the picture do its own exploitation work. This practice often had resulted in lower gross receipts than might otherwise be expected from percentage bookings. If a percentage arrangement was used, the sales manager was convinced that more could be secured for the distributor by a guaranty and split of gross returns above a specified amount than by the proposed method. This opinion may be substantiated by applying the most common percentage arrangement to the example previously cited. As a conservative estimate, a guaranty of only $250 may be assumed, a figure which